[Clipart] AMD64 and Gentoo

[Jon Phillips]

On Sun, 2005-07-10 at 01:52 +0100, Alan Horkan wrote:
> [Could someone please tweak the mailing list so messages are not marked as
> coming from OCAL List and change it to something which might help our
> search engine rankings like anything with the word "Clipart" in it.]

Huh??? That is set in my own mail browser. The list sets [Clipart] in
the subject line. What change would help google?
[http://www.openclipart.org]

or [Open Clip Art Library]

or [clipart]

I'll go with the consensus...and make the change...but what you see in
the CC below is from how I have the list saved in evolution.

Jon


> On Sat, 9 Jul 2005, Gavin Panella wrote:
> 
> > Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 09:41:19 +0200
> > From: Gavin Panella <gavin at premolo.net>
> > To: Jon Phillips <jon at rejon.org>
> > Cc: OCAL list <clipart at lists.freedesktop.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Clipart] AMD64 and Gentoo
> >
> > Hi Jon,
> >
> > I put a new ebuild up a few moments after the first announcement of
> > 0.15.
> >
> > One thing though - there has just appeared an ebuild in the main
> > Portage tree for 0.12, as x11-misc/openclipart. The main differences
> > are:
> >
> >
> > - That ebuild has several options (via use flags). You can choose what
> > what file-types to install, and to compress or not. My ebuild installs
> > the library as is, except for docs which are put into
> > /usr/share/doc/openclipart-xxx.
> >
> > - My ebuild installs to /usr/share/clipart, and the one in the tree
> > installs to /usr/share/clipart/openclipart.
> 
> It is wrong to assume we will be the only clipart collection ever and I
> would recommend you use the path /usr/share/clipart/openclipart
> 
> This is something we very much need to get right now and stick with it.
> 
> > - The ebuild in the tree is in x11-misc, which is, IMHO, wrong. I chose
> > media-gfx, but I may be wrong too :-)
> 
> sounds better, not that I know anything about gentoo.
> 
> > might be difficult seeing as there is already one in the tree. If
> > you're talking to the right people, perhaps ask which is better of the
> > above differences, and I'll merge the two ebuilds. Then we can submit
> > the resulting Frankenstein Monster, erm, beautiful offspring.
> 
> sounds ideal.
> 
> If there is anyway for gentoo ebuilds to recommend but not require things
> it would be a good idea to recommed a version of RSVG we dont crash (see
> other thread.  I encountered something like this myself maybe a year ago
> but managed to isolate it to a bad SVG and librsvg had already been fixed
> but the problem was most distributions aren't up to date enough).
> 
> I should look at creating an autopackage.
> 
> --
> Alan
> http://advogato.org/person/AlanHorkan/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> clipart mailing list
> clipart at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/clipart
> 
-- 
Jon Phillips

USA PH 510.499.0894
jon at rejon.org
http://www.rejon.org

Inkscape (http://inkscape.org)
Open Clip Art Library (www.openclipart.org)