[Clipart] release 13 coming up
holger at treebuilder.de
Mon May 2 13:56:14 PDT 2005
Stephen Silver wrote:
>Andrew Archibald wrote:
>>I think it's more of a problem that the XML declaration and the
>>DOCTYPE are missing - that's just not a good idea, and it could
>>be part of what's giving viewers the fits. (Is XML::Twig really
>I wasn't worried about the missing DOCTYPE, because there doesn't
>seem to be much point specifying a DTD that the file won't validate
>against. If you look at the example of an SVG file with RDF metadata
>in the SVG specification (in section 21), you'll see that it has no
>DOCTYPE. I would be surprised if this causes a problem for any SVG
>However, it has since occurred to me that simply stripping out the
>DOCTYPE may lose the SVG version number, if this isn't specified as
>an attribute of the 'svg' element. I think we should be keeping this
>By the way, I can't even view these files in Inkscape 0.41. I think
>it probably depends on which versions of libxml and/or Expat Inkscape
>is built with.
>Holger Will has told me that the files don't work in Mozilla's native
>SVG implementation either.
as discused in a private email with Stephan Silver, i did the following:
> 1) add <?xml version="1.0"?> to the beginning of each file.
> 2) replace "svg:" with ""
> 3) change "xmlns:svg" to "xmlns"
that should fix the problems. i havent tested all files ;-) , but what
i've tested runs fine in mozilla. should do fine in Konqueror,ASV,Batik
you can download the fixed files at
hope all works ok with these files!
all the best
More information about the clipart