[Clipart] celebrity image
mibrahim at mibrahim.net
Mon Dec 31 13:40:00 PST 2007
Reporters take pictures of actors & actresses and post it all over the
newspapers & web without their consent, actually sometimes the pictures
are in an undesirable situations for them - yet they get posted.
I think it is enough to show a disclaimer may be like what wikipedia
does in a clear box:
I also suggest to add a check box for the uploader that states the the
not **significantly** alter the image from its original source. Images
has to be altered in order
to change its format from raster to vectors. However, there were
situations like this:
when CBS altered an image in a way they thought people would like it
more by making Katie look thinner. She didn't like it and was in the
news headlines for a couple of days even though she worked for CBS for a
period of time.
So my opinion is to allow addition of celebrity images. If adding the
check box is a trouble then may be vectorizing & cliparting of
celebrity/people images should be outlined in the policy.
Happy new year to all of you,
Greg Bulmash wrote:
> Perhaps there needs to be a special warning on such pages, stating that
> while the image itself is public domain with respect to copyright,
> images of famous people carry other restrictions and you should consult
> an attorney before using it in commercial projects.
> I don't believe that such images should be rejected, because they do
> have a lot of legitimate uses. But beyond a "consult an attorney"
> disclaimer, I don't know how much more you can do. Heck, most people
> still write in and ask for permission to use the images because they
> won't RTFM.
> You could put up 50 point blinking red letters, and some people would
> miss them.
> Add the disclaimer to the image description/page, and let it go.
> John Olsen wrote:
>> This is one of those fuzzy areas of the law still being sorted out.
>> In the US it is perfectly acceptable for an artist to create a
>> recognizable image of another person. One court decision excerpt:
>> "The court held that Sections 50 and 51 had no application because an
>> "artist may make a work of art that includes a recognizable likeness
>> of a person without her or his written consent and sell at least a
>> limited number of copies thereof" without violating the statute. The
>> court also declared in dicta that works of art, including sculptures,
>> were deserving of First Amendment protection that superseded the right
>> of privacy."
>> The only problem I see is in use by someone taking the image from
>> here. If the image was used for publicity purposes or to make money
>> based on the fame of the person, then the user would be in violation.
>> It might be easy enough to solve this by renaming the file with a
>> vague name - "Hollywood actress" or just "Sandra". Thoughts?
> clipart mailing list
> clipart at lists.freedesktop.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the clipart