[CREATE] CREATE Digest, Vol 164, Issue 12

[Eylul]

Hi Paul,

First of all thank you very much for organizing this meeting. It was a
lot of valuable information about technical challenges and discussion
and thoughts so far on the topic. An idea for future meetings might be
to clarify how long they will last and make that explicit (and schedule
a time for next time if ıt turns out more discussion is needed). Not
that I am asking why it wasn't done this time: considering how last
minute the whole organization was, I am grateful and amazed at the
number of people who made time to drop by and join the conversation. :)

In terms of future discussion a matrix channel or something similar
would be nice.

First people might actually want to collaborate on proposals and
implementations, or brainstorm, and it would be better to not clutter
the forum with that. Second is that I feel there needs to be some
discussion to clarify the actual use case(s) for .ora file format. Some
the trade-offs discussions didn't come to a conclusion in part due to
differing point of views about what the file format would and could be
used for (e.g. is this meant to be a one way exchange solution to move
between various tasks: that would focus on a easy to implement limited
common ground; or is it literally meant to be a common primary filetype
among a narrow range relatively similar software that is comprehensive?
Does it try to be both, is it feasible for it to be both? etc)

A chatting platform ideally would also help welcome more user
perspectives of the workflows and use cases at creation stage, for
proposals that can benefit from this type of input early.  

Best

Eylul

On 31.05.2020 01:34, InkLab App wrote:
> Hi Johann, 
>
> I apologize that the duration and content of the meeting was not
> satisfactory in general.  Personally, I was also disappointed that I
> did not get to touch some of the topics I was interested in, at all.
> It is my first time trying to moderate a meeting of this style, so I
> will keep in mind to explicitly offer the possibility for some folk to
> stay later than others if they desire. I got the impression from a few
> folks during the meeting by way of offhand comments that they were
> interested in not going too far over an hour, and so I didn't want to
> infringe on others' time by ignoring these comments. I am welcome to
> suggestions for methods to better time manage a meeting of this style
> in the event that it is required to do another online meeting in the
> future (hopefully not in general!). 
>
> As far as online proposals and vetoing, I think discussion should be
> (hopefully) easier using the system Boud was trying to set up
> at https://invent.kde.org/documentation/openraster-org/-/merge_requests/1 I
> would also be open to starting another type of recorded chat system
> for use with casual proposal discussion before going through the full
> effort of making the implementation and documentation for the official
> submission. Please let me know if you have any preference for this.
> Perhaps a matrix channel would be useful?
>
> Again, I apologize for your experience and share some of the
> sentiment. I hope you found some of the discussion fruitful in any case!
>
> -Paul
>
> _______________________________________________
> CREATE mailing list
> CREATE at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/create/attachments/20200531/242bf55c/attachment.htm>