Question with object_path registrations

Havoc Pennington hp@redhat.com
21 Sep 2003 19:46:18 -0400


On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 18:11, Seth Nickell wrote:
> OK, reading through the code I finally figured it out. You have to start
> registering paths *at the base of the tree*, but not including "/". If
> you register "/some/long/path" right from the get-go, it looks like
> things succeeded, but a list of "/some/long" won't succeed because
> "/some/long" is unknown. It may be prudent to help people understand
> this in the docs too, though perhaps this is just me being bubble
> headed.

If true this is a bug, it's not intended that /some/long has to have a
registered handler.

Havoc