User authentication to services
oliv__a at users.sourceforge.net
Fri Jun 18 07:25:14 PDT 2004
Kay Sievers [Fri, 18 Jun 2004]:
> > - the BaseName property replicates the functionality of
> > the GetServiceOwner, so we need to decide between these two.
> I've replaced it by GetProperty and changed:
> dbus/glib/dbus-gproxy.c:dbus_gproxy_new_for_service_owner() to call
> it instead. (Hmm, needs to be tested if it still works)
> Is it ok, this way? If yes, I will change the spec too.
What's wrong with having two different methods ? With a single
GetProperty method the reply message carries either an INT32 or a
STRING. That(s not very nice.
> > - the name "GetServiceProperty" isn't a bit funny; it's a
> > property of the connection, not the service.
> > Suggest just "GetProperty"
But the base name is a property of the service.
More information about the dbus