oliv__a at users.sourceforge.net
Thu May 27 16:33:35 PDT 2004
Havoc Pennington <hp at redhat.com> [Thu, 27 May 2004 16:31:00 -0400]:
> I think maybe this is more evidence that we need to get the
> GLib/Qt/Python bindings done; Seth and Dan were just bitching to me
> about the raw C API, which is indeed a low-level thing designed to
> implement bindings and not much else.
I implemented the ownership tracking but it depends on other patches
not in yet (the GetServiceOwner bus driver method).
> Maybe this answers one of the questions in the TODO, which is whether
> dbus/dbus.h should be included when you include the glib bindings - I
> think the answer is no, we should do a full opaque wrapper that bumps
> the API to the higher object-based level.
There's a still a DBusPendingCall appearing somewhere, it would need
to be wrapped.
More information about the dbus