[patch] generate marshallers and metadata from dbus-glib-tool

Havoc Pennington hp at redhat.com
Thu Feb 10 14:43:12 PST 2005

On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 23:31 +0100, Tako Schotanus wrote:
> I didn't exactly pay much attention to this thread so most likely I'm 
> missing the point here completely, but:
> the introspection format is for objects so they can tell the world what 
> kind of interfaces and methods they support isn't it? But does the above 
> explanation mean that each method of each object will have to have a 
> binding element for each possible language supported by DBus? That just 
> doesn't seem right. (And therefore I'm most likely missing the point, 
> like I said ;-))

We're kind of overloading this format. When used for introspection, the
<binding> node (or equivalent) would be ignored or disallowed. But we're
also using the same format as an "IDL" for code generation.


More information about the dbus mailing list