Details vs Match On Args
hp at redhat.com
Wed Jul 13 07:58:01 EST 2005
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 15:23 -0400, John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
> I've been thinking about it a bit and I think we need to do a match on
> arguments instead of details.
> So it has been discussed adding filtering of messages based on
> arguments. We were either going to go with this or the details patch
> sent awhile ago to deal with signals waking up threads because matching
> was not granular enough .
> In my opinion I think we need to match on args to be more flexible and
> also add wildcard matching. The reason I want to do this is so a
> program can watch for specific names coming on the bus without getting
> deluged by all the names that attach to the bus. The wildcard matching
> would be for listening for specific namespaces such as listening for all
> names that start with org.freedesktop.* (more compelling would be
I think the wildcard stuff is overkill (and potentially has weird side
effects). Basically the namespace doesn't imply anything necessarily
about the stuff in the namespace.
More information about the dbus