dbus_g_pending_call and proxies

[Havoc Pennington]

On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 19:46 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> 
> It seems the original idea was that the lifecycle of the pending calls
> is separate from that of the proxy, but that doesn't seem valuable to me
> if you need the proxy to actually end the call. 
> 
> I've started to write a patch, but before I go and do that I just wanted
> to be sure I wasn't missing something...
> 

What you're saying makes sense to me. Maybe it would be better to have
pending_call_get_proxy() rather than another callback arg? I'm not
sure. 

Havoc