Request for the 1.0 release
hp at redhat.com
Fri Feb 24 12:05:38 PST 2006
On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 12:48 -0500, John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
> The DCOP parity issue is about the only thing I can think of that would
> change API/ABI at this point. There needs to be an assessment by the Qt
> guys of what we need to put in the TODO. Other things like moving
> gnome-VFS to D-Bus are blocking on this also.
There were a variety of things in recent threads that probably didn't
get captured as todo items; though several probably aren't 1.0 stoppers.
I don't think it's all on the Qt guys to catalog those, since there were
also items brought up by others.
Stuff that I remember that sounded possibly 1.0-ish:
- the new dispatch status and fixing that deadlock
- some way to implement dcop-like controlled reentrancy?
(I consider this "if someone starts prototyping it tomorrow,
maybe we could get enough info to decide whether to do it, but
otherwise not a blocker")
- fix the spec/docs on the NoReply annotation so people know what
the heck it is
- introduce a way to list exception names in introspection
More information about the dbus