1.0 release [was: Re: One user morne than one time logged in.]

Havoc Pennington hp at redhat.com
Tue Jan 24 13:45:24 PST 2006

On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 20:11 +0000, Robert McQueen wrote:
> I'd be happy to call the library and daemon 1.0, but I still keep
> finding serious holes in the bindings I'm using (glib and python) which
> could very realistically be made hard/impossible to fix by commiting to
> an ABI. As a random idea, could we move all of the bindings into
> seperate trees and version them seperately, or do we need to lay down
> some commitment about what's required for a supported binding for 1.0
> and get them up to scratch before releasing?

I agree that the bindings aren't ready to freeze. Whether to put them in
a separate tree, or just mark them specially as "not yet frozen," I
don't know.


More information about the dbus mailing list