1.0 release [was: Re: One user morne than one time logged in.]

[Daniel P. Berrange]

On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 05:12:38PM -0500, John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 16:45 -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 20:11 +0000, Robert McQueen wrote:
> > > I'd be happy to call the library and daemon 1.0, but I still keep
> > > finding serious holes in the bindings I'm using (glib and python) which
> > > could very realistically be made hard/impossible to fix by commiting to
> > > an ABI. As a random idea, could we move all of the bindings into
> > > seperate trees and version them seperately, or do we need to lay down
> > > some commitment about what's required for a supported binding for 1.0
> > > and get them up to scratch before releasing?
> > 
> > I agree that the bindings aren't ready to freeze. Whether to put them in
> > a separate tree, or just mark them specially as "not yet frozen," I
> > don't know.
> 
> Having the bindings hold up 1.0 seems silly to me.  Keeping them in tree
> for now doesn't bother me and we can state clearly in any release notes
> that the bindings are still subject to change.  0.60 has seemed pretty
> stable as far as I can see.  We should move it to a beta 0.90 release
> and fix up the little nagging bugs.

Have we had enough real world testing of the new features introduced
in 0.60 yet (name queueing & replacement stuff) - are there even any 
apps using them yet?

Dan.
-- 
|=-            GPG key: http://www.berrange.com/~dan/gpgkey.txt       -=|
|=-       Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/              -=|
|=-           Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/               -=|
|=-   berrange at redhat.com  -  Daniel Berrange  -  dan at berrange.com    -=|
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dbus/attachments/20060125/88070593/attachment.pgp