Is it D-Bus, DBus, D-BUS or dbus?
John (J5) Palmieri
johnp at redhat.com
Thu Jul 13 19:02:34 PDT 2006
We are talking about the print name, not modules or code to be clear.
This is how people should blog about D-BUS or write books and articles
about it. So you would call them the D-BUS Haskel bindings if we were
to chose that variant but the module would be DBus. I don't think names
should be restricted to symbol name bounds (e.g. the GNOME prepends its
modules with gnome)
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 10:50 +0900, Evan Martin wrote:
> One thing to consider is that language bindings will force their own names.
> I have a nearly-releasable binding for Haskell, and I've been
> referring to it as "DBus" because you can't use hyphens in module
> names.
>
> (I think I picked up this particular spelling of the name because I
> also saw DBus throughout the source in names like DBusMessage, again
> because of C's naming limitations.) So even if it's called D-Bus,
> none of the code or docs I write will be able to refer to it like
> that.
>
> On 7/14/06, John (J5) Palmieri <johnp at redhat.com> wrote:
> > As we move towards 1.0 it is the little things that we need to start to
> > clean up. To that end I would like to get a consensus on how we should
> > present the "D-Bus brand". It is important to have a unified front here
> > because it is one of those little easy things that makes the project
> > look more polished and allow people who write about D-Bus to not have to
> > stop and ask people "how do I write the actual word".
> >
> > Personally I prefer D-Bus since it highlights the important bits.
> > However all the documentation we have and most of the wiki uses D-BUS
> > which is a bit bold but there you have it. Some of the newer stuff uses
> > DBus but I feel this is wrong (looks like a typo of Bus).
> >
> > Being of the less work is more fun camp I propose we stick with D-BUS.
> > It is not the most visually appealing but it does have precedence and
> > I'm not going to be the one who goes through the docs and wiki to change
> > all the instances.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > --
> > John (J5) Palmieri <johnp at redhat.com>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dbus mailing list
> > dbus at lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dbus
> >
--
John (J5) Palmieri <johnp at redhat.com>
More information about the dbus
mailing list