Splitting out core and bindings final stages

[John (J5) Palmieri]

On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 18:06 +1000, Brad Hards wrote:
> On Sunday 07 May 2006 17:21 pm, John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
> > On Sat, 2006-05-06 at 16:46 +0100, Rob Taylor wrote:
> > > John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 18:06 +1000, Brad Hards wrote:
> > > >> On Friday 05 May 2006 09:17 am, John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
> > > >>> NOTE: for the time being the dbus core libraries will continue to be
> > > >>> worked on in CVS and the bindings in git once the move happens.  The
> > > >>> core, along with its history will also be in git and if we ever
> > > >>> decide to move it we can import again from CVS and not duplicate the
> > > >>> history.
> > > >>
> > > >> Where / when was the decision to move to git made?
> > > >>
> > > >> Brad
> > > >
> > > > On the dbus irc channel.  Remember the move is only for the bindings
> > > > right now and not core.
> > >
> > > I should say that the consensus for git isn't absolute
> Is there a recording / log of the decision process? If not, who was there?
> 
> > I was pretty strong.  In fact if I remember correctly the sentiments
> > were (paraphrasing) "anything but SVN" and "git looks like the best
> > choice".
> I asked Thiago about his opinion. We managed to Achieve Concensus (TM) - dbus 
> bindings for Qt4 may be best placed in kde's svn archive.

That sounds fine since they are already there as stand alone bindings.
No extra work is involved.  For those bindings which will remain on fd.o
I think it makes sense to put them in git.

Thiago didn't bring up any issue with the move.

-- 
John (J5) Palmieri <johnp at redhat.com>