Issue with _dbus_write_socket on windows

Peter Kümmel syntheticpp at gmx.net
Sun Nov 19 10:56:31 PST 2006


Havoc Pennington wrote:
> 
> 
> Peter Kümmel wrote:
>>
>> we already have a 2-way mapping between dbus_uid_t and SID
>>
> 
> Are you putting the dbus_uid_t in the lock name? Remember the dbus_uid_t
> is per-process.
> 
> Havoc
> 

This is a problem, indeed. So we must find a other way.

-- 
Peter Kümmel


More information about the dbus mailing list