Issue with _dbus_write_socket on windows

[Ralf Habacker]

Peter Kümmel schrieb:
> Havoc Pennington wrote:
>   
>> Peter Kümmel wrote:
>>     
>>> we already have a 2-way mapping between dbus_uid_t and SID
>>>
>>>       
>> Are you putting the dbus_uid_t in the lock name? Remember the dbus_uid_t
>> is per-process.
>>
>> Havoc
>>
>>     
>
> This is a problem, indeed. So we must find a other way.
>
>   
Wouldn't be the current user name or user sid uniq enough ?

Ralf