Issue with _dbus_write_socket on windows
ralf.habacker at freenet.de
Sun Nov 19 11:04:42 PST 2006
Peter Kümmel schrieb:
> Havoc Pennington wrote:
>> Peter Kümmel wrote:
>>> we already have a 2-way mapping between dbus_uid_t and SID
>> Are you putting the dbus_uid_t in the lock name? Remember the dbus_uid_t
>> is per-process.
> This is a problem, indeed. So we must find a other way.
Wouldn't be the current user name or user sid uniq enough ?
More information about the dbus