pcjc2 at cam.ac.uk
Thu Oct 12 10:19:55 PDT 2006
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 13:12 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> Peter Clifton wrote:
> > Where do the DBUS people stand on this type of problem... I need a main
> > loop independent DBUS library, which is ideally a little friendlier to
> > use than raw libdbus.
> From my perspective, this would be another binding built on libdbus. It
> wouldn't go in libdbus itself because people using GLib or Qt or Java
> would not want to use some weird dbus-specific system, they want to use
> GObject and QObject and java.lang.Object.
> I don't know of anyone with plans to work on a pure C high-level API,
> but of course anyone is more than welcome to be the first!
This was also my feeling. Unfortunately, I don't have deep understanding
of DBUS necessary to write a complete binding, nor the time necessary to
I will work with libdbus for now, but hopefully someone will pick up the
challenge to write a nice library :)
More information about the dbus