intro and idea about multiple-instance services / naming fallback framework

[Rudi Cilibrasi, Ph.D.]

Sure, that is one possibility.  If it doesn't make it into the library,
then I am hoping it will serve as a clear example to help make
discussion more concrete and productive: I would like to understand
the right way to, for example, utilize all four CPU's on a multiprocessor
machine running DBUS type computation servers (for grid-type
scientific application with lots of CPU).  Right now I am trying to
get a grasp on what possibilities exist.  This scope thing is the
only generic solution I could think of, and it doesn't seem that generic.
So I would like to stimulate more discussion and solutions to the
problem but not necessarily fix on this one so much as analyze it.
Cheers

Rudi

On 4/25/07, Havoc Pennington <hp at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Rudi Cilibrasi, Ph.D. wrote:
> >   I also have some explanatory comments and I include the
> > sample output in namemain.c
> > as well for your enjoyment.  I look forward to your responses.  Best
> > regards,
> >
>
> What kind of feedback are you looking for, would you see these functions
> or some variant of them as an addition to libdbus?
>
> Havoc
>
>


-- 
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dbus/attachments/20070425/0ff5381b/attachment.html