Question on service activation

Havoc Pennington hp at redhat.com
Fri Feb 23 11:58:31 PST 2007



Kevin Krammer wrote:
> On Friday 23 February 2007 15:32, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> 
>> I would suggest we worry first and primarily about launching the right
>> org.fd.EMail provider if none is running, which is the big glaring problem.
> 
> Hmm, well this one is already covered by AddActivatableService, isn't it?
> 

Yes assuming someone implements that ;-)

>> A minor detail of this would be adding support for multiple bus names in
>> the same .service file
> 
> Isn't this already possible? The D-Bus tutorial has an example with exactly 
> this situation (two names)

Apps can own two names, but I thought we hadn't added support for 
something like "Names=foo;bar" in the .service file. Maybe we did.

Havoc



More information about the dbus mailing list