Question on service activation
Havoc Pennington
hp at redhat.com
Fri Feb 23 11:58:31 PST 2007
Kevin Krammer wrote:
> On Friday 23 February 2007 15:32, Havoc Pennington wrote:
>
>> I would suggest we worry first and primarily about launching the right
>> org.fd.EMail provider if none is running, which is the big glaring problem.
>
> Hmm, well this one is already covered by AddActivatableService, isn't it?
>
Yes assuming someone implements that ;-)
>> A minor detail of this would be adding support for multiple bus names in
>> the same .service file
>
> Isn't this already possible? The D-Bus tutorial has an example with exactly
> this situation (two names)
Apps can own two names, but I thought we hadn't added support for
something like "Names=foo;bar" in the .service file. Maybe we did.
Havoc
More information about the dbus
mailing list