D-Bus core due for a release?
hp at redhat.com
Mon May 21 09:34:15 PDT 2007
Simon McVittie wrote:
> ... to which I'd add all the patches I've sent for review today. Havoc
> or other reviewer types, do you have any objection to merging any of
> these to the 1.0.x branch?
>> Possibly candidates for inclusion:
>> * 2006-12-19 patch from Ray Strode: don't exit() daemon on failure to
>> reload config on SIGHUP; instead carry on as before
Should be merged back for sure.
>> Future things for 1.1.x:
>> * lots of Win32 and cmake stuff
>> * dbus_message_marshal, _unmarshal
>> * add user database
> Are any of these things so broken that they are blockers for 1.1.0?
I wouldn't think so. It's an odd-number release for a reason.
> Also, are any of these pending-merge changes blockers for a 1.1.0
> release, or can I go ahead with that and worry about stable releases
There's no reason stable and unstable releases have to be made at the
same time, though since you already figured out how to do the stable one
and what to merge, it'd probably be good to go ahead and do it so you
don't lose the benefit of that.
More information about the dbus