dbus: Proposed relicense to MIT/X11
desrt at desrt.ca
Thu Sep 13 14:58:49 PDT 2007
On Thu, 2007-13-09 at 22:30 +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Ryan Lortie wrote:
> >I'd take this to mean that, as a package, dbus is licensed under the
> Every single .c and .h file says otherwise.
This confusion is another argument in favour of an unambiguous
> But, let me repeat my important points here: I approve of the clean-up. I
> just want to make sure for contributors reading that I don't think GPLv3
> is an issue today, with our code as it stands.
Can you please "reply to all" to the original email clearly stating that
you approve of your contributions being relicensed?
More information about the dbus