dbus: Proposed relicense to MIT/X11

[Ryan Lortie]

On Thu, 2007-13-09 at 22:30 +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Ryan Lortie wrote:
> >I'd take this to mean that, as a package, dbus is licensed under the
> >GPLv2.
> 
> Every single .c and .h file says otherwise.

This confusion is another argument in favour of an unambiguous
relicense :)

> But, let me repeat my important points here: I approve of the clean-up. I 
> just want to make sure for contributors reading that I don't think GPLv3 
> is an issue today, with our code as it stands.

Can you please "reply to all" to the original email clearly stating that
you approve of your contributions being relicensed?


Cheers