problem with system activation

Bill Nottingham notting at
Fri Sep 21 10:07:32 PDT 2007

Richard Hughes (hughsient at said: 
> > People who still write new software without requiring proper file
> > names, should be hit with a big stick.
> I think Bill meant the bit before the .service, e.g.
> org.freedesktop.hal.service instead of hal-daemon.service

Right. I really don't care if that's the policy for system services,
just as long as it's documented that it's different for system activation
services vs. other services.


More information about the dbus mailing list