problem with system activation

[Bill Nottingham]

Richard Hughes (hughsient at gmail.com) said: 
> > People who still write new software without requiring proper file
> > names, should be hit with a big stick.
> 
> I think Bill meant the bit before the .service, e.g.
> org.freedesktop.hal.service instead of hal-daemon.service

Right. I really don't care if that's the policy for system services,
just as long as it's documented that it's different for system activation
services vs. other services.

Bill