Calling back to a calling process after dbus_g_proxy_call_no_reply

[Havoc Pennington]

Hi,

On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 3:09 AM, Braden McDaniel <braden at endoframe.com> wrote:
> I'd thought that using dbus_g_proxy_call_no_reply in the host process
> would leave it free to service a subsequent call from the hosted
> process; is this inaccurate?
>

This sounds like it should work to me. Maybe something more subtle is going on.

Havoc