[ANNOUNCE] D-Bus 1.1.4 (1.2.0RC2) - "Opps, I did it again" released

Ralf Habacker ralf.habacker at freenet.de
Wed Jan 23 13:50:51 PST 2008


Olivier Hochreutiner schrieb:
>> Depends on the Windows port maintainers.  A decision was made not to
>> wait for them as the UNIX port needs the system activation feature to
>> support a lot of the future Linux infrastructure.  Under Linux D-Bus is
>> a vital part of the core system.  That is not to say I wouldn't release
>> a 1.2.1 just for windows support but we are not going to block on it.
>> If the Windows port ever stabilizes we would be happy to coordinate
>> releases.
>>     
>
> I see. Actually my point was to have a 1.2.0 version that at least
> compiles under Windows, but I guess making a version 1.2.1 is fine
> too. This way there should be more time to test and polish things.
> BTW, Peter, Ralf, is there a TODO list for the Windows port ?
>   
some todo's are listed here 
http://windbus.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/windbus/trunk/README.win?revision=611&view=markup 

and there are still some open patches 
http://windbus.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/windbus/trunk/dbus-win.patch?revision=642&view=markup

One additional issue raised in the meantime is that the code does not 
have any import/export decorations, which is required to build a shared 
dbus library with msvc.
Currently a def file 
http://windbus.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/windbus/trunk/cmake/dbus/dbus-1.def.cmake?revision=743&view=markup 
is used for linking.

It may also be that the dbus git and the windbus svn are out sync. It 
will be probably required to update the win32 related stuff from the 
windbus svn.

Ralf


More information about the dbus mailing list