[ANNOUNCE] D-Bus 1.1.4 (1.2.0RC2) - "Opps, I did it again" released
Ralf Habacker
ralf.habacker at freenet.de
Wed Jan 23 13:50:51 PST 2008
Olivier Hochreutiner schrieb:
>> Depends on the Windows port maintainers. A decision was made not to
>> wait for them as the UNIX port needs the system activation feature to
>> support a lot of the future Linux infrastructure. Under Linux D-Bus is
>> a vital part of the core system. That is not to say I wouldn't release
>> a 1.2.1 just for windows support but we are not going to block on it.
>> If the Windows port ever stabilizes we would be happy to coordinate
>> releases.
>>
>
> I see. Actually my point was to have a 1.2.0 version that at least
> compiles under Windows, but I guess making a version 1.2.1 is fine
> too. This way there should be more time to test and polish things.
> BTW, Peter, Ralf, is there a TODO list for the Windows port ?
>
some todo's are listed here
http://windbus.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/windbus/trunk/README.win?revision=611&view=markup
and there are still some open patches
http://windbus.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/windbus/trunk/dbus-win.patch?revision=642&view=markup
One additional issue raised in the meantime is that the code does not
have any import/export decorations, which is required to build a shared
dbus library with msvc.
Currently a def file
http://windbus.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/windbus/trunk/cmake/dbus/dbus-1.def.cmake?revision=743&view=markup
is used for linking.
It may also be that the dbus git and the windbus svn are out sync. It
will be probably required to update the win32 related stuff from the
windbus svn.
Ralf
More information about the dbus
mailing list