[PATCH] Add DBusServer wrapper for dbus-python

[Huang Peng]

Hi Simon,

Do you get some time for review this patch? 

Thanks.

在 2008-07-04五的 07:53 +0800，Huang Peng写道：
> 在 2008-07-03四的 12:27 +0100，Simon McVittie写道：
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > On Thu, 03 Jul 2008 at 09:47:56 +0800, Huang Peng wrote:
> > > After investigating the dbus_server_* APIs, I think the DBusServer is
> > > just like a listen socket. It listens on a socket, and create a new
> > > connection object, when a client connects to it. And developers can use
> > > the new created connection object as they want (could use it with both
> > > high-level or low-level API). Like, call dbus_connection_add_filter on
> > > it to filter incoming messages, register dbus.service.Object with this
> > > connection for handler messages or  use it send customized message to
> > > client. (but some low-level API of DBusConnection is unsupported. like:
> > > dbus_connection_{dispatch, pop_message, ...})
> > 
> > Right, I agree with you there: DBusServer should be a factory for
> > dbus.connection.Connection instances (or possibly subclass instances).
> > 
> > I was mainly responding to J5's suggestion somewhere (on the bug you filed?)
> > that DBusServer should be made to look like d.s.Object, which I do disagree
> > with.
> > 
> > Yes, some of the Connection API is unsupported; I think supporting
> > both dispatch/pop_message, and using a "proper" main loop, will just
> > lead to confusion.
> > 
> > > I implemented server.set_new_connection_function (callback,
> > > UserDefinedConnectionSubClass). When a new client connects to the
> > > server, Server will create a new instance
> > > of UserDefinedConnectionSubClass, and pass it to callback function. Is
> > > it like your idea?
> > 
> > Yeah, that sounds good in principle. Hopefully I can do a detailed
> > review of your code sometime in the next week or so.
> 
> Thank for your time.
> 
>