[PATCH 2/2] configure.in: not all gccs support -Wno-pointer-sign

[Havoc Pennington]

Hi,

On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Marc Mutz <marc at kdab.net> wrote:
> It probably makes sense to have a function that wraps these repeated checks,
> then again, one shouldn't add unnecessary checks to configure, to not let it
> run for too long.

It seems a bit silly to fork/exec to test whether -Wall works for
example ... we should only check the ones that really don't work on
some gccs still in common use...

Havoc