Interoperability between DBus implementations on Windows

[Thiago Macieira]

Em Domingo 25. Outubro 2009, às 12.26.59, Tor Lillqvist escreveu:
> A third issue is that DBusSharp implements an altogether different
> transport mechanism based on Windows named pipes (don't get confused
> by the term, Windows named pipes are not really related to POSIX named
> pipes). Possibly DBusSharp even considers this transport the default
> one to use on Windows. So should this named pipe transport then also
> be added to the dbus4win (and/or upstream) implementations?

I doubt it.

See my reply on the subject dated April 21 (Message-Id: 
<200904211833.35416.thiago at kde.org>)
-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
  Senior Product Manager - Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
      PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
      E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dbus/attachments/20091025/192220cd/attachment.pgp