Application authorisations

James purpleidea at gmail.com
Thu Apr 29 09:04:48 PDT 2010


I think it's possible that this is getting outside of the use cases
that geoclue/etc should be designed for. If someone wants to setup a
LTSP style thing with proper geoclue on each thin client then they'll
likely have to do some work to get that going properly... I don't
think this should be the primary issue to worry about.


On 4/29/10, Joerg Barfurth <Joerg.Barfurth at sun.com> wrote:
> James schrieb:
>
> > Hey,
> > I'm certaintly not the leading expert in this field but I'll offer my
> > thoughts if it helps:
> > The problem I see is that for a given multiuser system, any one user
> > could "give away" the position of the whole machine if
> > geoclue/geolocation was a per user session thing. Anyone with root
> > should have the final say.
> >
> >
>
>  But in some multi-user - and even single user - systems the users are not
> physically in the same place as the machine. There are various technologies
> for remoting sessions to thin client devices or remote desktop client
> software. Some of these technologies include capabilities for remote
> devices, so you could even have a GPS 'location' device per user.
>
>  So you first need to define what data you are collecting/protecting: the
> location of the shared machine (which may be in some central data center for
> the described scenarios) or the location of the user.
>
>  - Jörg
>
>


More information about the dbus mailing list