dbus as the IPC sync method

[yinxb]

Thanks for all of your replies.
And now Can someone put eyes on my problem.
 Actually,I am using the lxc(new PID/IPC namespace) for
isolation,and is required to execute as root(imexplicity calls
clone()).When I execute
    root at yinxb:/home/yinxb/Downloads/dbus_test/dbus-example2#
./dbus-example receive,
and unluckly gets the following message:
----------
Connection Error (Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include:
the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security
policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network
connection was broken.)
----------

   I also tried the DBUS_BUS_SYSTEM,and the get following message
----------
Connection Error (Failed to connect to socket
/var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket: No such file or directory)
----------

2011/12/27 Pavel Strashkin <pavel.strashkin at gmail.com>:
> I don't need any recommendations. I have an experience and the
> projects which are the proof of right choice. When people are telling
> me "you're doing wrong, you should wait for recommendations, bla bla
> bla" while i'm carrying all this baggage, i just don't get it. Nothing
> is gonna change unless you change it in your mind. TCP/IP is part of
> dbus for years and if nobody is crying about it at each corner, it's
> dbus team fault, they just missed the audience, but i'm glad that some
> people found such really useful part of it and showed to me so i could
> start use it and have fun.
>
> Do not misjudge dbus + tcp/ip. This is the only what i wanted to say. Really.
>
> 2011/12/26 Ville M. Vainio <vivainio at gmail.com>:
>> The fact that it works does not mean you should use it in this
>> fashion, at least before being aware of the options.
>>
>> Unless something has changed and dbus is indeed being recommended for
>> inter-machine comms these days.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Pavel Strashkin
>> <pavel.strashkin at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I disagree with you, Ville. It does and it does pretty well, even in
>>> cluster environment. It supports TCP/IP as a transport so you can do
>>> whatever you want.
>>>
>>> 2011/12/26 Ville M. Vainio <vivainio at gmail.com>:
>>>> Dbus is not meant for comms between machines. Consider something like plain
>>>> tcp sockets or zeromq.
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 27, 2011 4:05 AM, "yinxb" <yinxiaobiao at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> dbus mailing list
>>>> dbus at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dbus
>>>>