DBus for LSB

Tue Apr 17 12:47:52 PDT 2012

On terça-feira, 17 de abril de 2012 14.08.57, Colin Walters wrote:
> As for 4) - not very interesting for standardization I think; they're
> all either developer tools or internal OS components.  Maybe fixing
> the dbus-send interface in stone would make sense - it's not like
> we're ever going to change it anyways.

Agreed. If any tool is to be standardised, it's dbus-launch (the one missing 
on OpenSUSE, which must be a mistake on the part of the OP). I can think of a 
few use-cases of launching a private bus, though rare.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
   Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
      PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
      E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dbus/attachments/20120417/420ac649/attachment.pgp>