libdbus vs libgio
matthias.clasen at gmail.com
Sun Sep 9 14:08:37 PDT 2012
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Sanel Zukan <sanelz at gmail.com> wrote:
> With current state, we are ended
> up with another pile of dependent libraries and lack of interest for
> original project just because someone likes to reinvent the wheel.
You are rushing to judgement based on incomplete information...
libdbus has its problems, e.g. wrt to threads. And there were 'native'
dbus bindings (ie not based on libdbus) long before gdbus came around.
Having gdbus inside glib (replacing the off-to-the-side dbus-glib
bindings) makes dbus a first-class api in gnome, and will only help to
keep interest in dbus alive.
More information about the dbus