multiple services per client?
Shiva
shivanagouda.rm at gmail.com
Mon Feb 18 12:50:06 UTC 2019
Got the configuration done on ONL for "system" instead of "session".
I was missing configuration file for "unique name" defined for a service. I
have created file in /etc/dbus-1/system.d/.
Thanks and Regards
Shiva
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 5:56 PM Felipe Gasper <felipe at felipegasper.com>
wrote:
>
> > On Feb 18, 2019, at 1:14 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <
> ldo at geek-central.gen.nz> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:52:07 -0500, Felipe Gasper wrote:
> >>
> >> It appears to be theoretically possible, but the reference
> >> implementation’s daemon seems always to rewrite the DESTINATION
> >> header to be the destination’s unique bus name, which in effect rules
> >> out multiple services per connection.
> >
> > If you want to differentiate services, do it based on the interface
> > name, not the bus name. Remember that a client can easily address a
> > request to your unique name instead of your well-known name anyway. You
> > don’t want to behave differently based on this, do you?
>
> The two services could employ interfaces A & B versus A & C, though. Then
> you can’t distinguish between the services for messages sent to interface
> A, even though they’re different services.
>
> My thinking was that a setup where two services share the same unique name
> would reject messages sent directly to the unique name. Of course, that
> would screw up messaging with the daemon itself.
>
> This is more a theoretical inquiry than anything, though it would seem to
> make for a nice abstraction were this possible.
>
> -F
> _______________________________________________
> dbus mailing list
> dbus at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dbus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dbus/attachments/20190218/d1963ef2/attachment.html>
More information about the dbus
mailing list