[PATCH] i915: use alloc_ordered_workqueue() instead of explicit UNBOUND w/ max_active = 1
Tejun Heo
tj at kernel.org
Thu Aug 23 12:22:27 PDT 2012
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:43:25AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 08:56:37AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:40:57 -0700, Tejun Heo <tj at kernel.org> wrote:
> > > This is an equivalent conversion and will ease scheduled removal of
> > > WQ_NON_REENTRANT.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj at kernel.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
>
> Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> for merging through any
> tree that pleases you (if it makes merging easier for WQ_NON_REENTRANT
> removal). Or should I just merge this through drm-intel-next?
I think it would be better to route this one through drm-intel-next.
WQ_NON_REENTRANT won't be deprecated until after the next -rc1 anyway.
Thanks!
--
tejun
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list