[PATCH] i915: use alloc_ordered_workqueue() instead of explicit UNBOUND w/ max_active = 1

[Daniel Vetter]

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:22:27PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:43:25AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 08:56:37AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:40:57 -0700, Tejun Heo <tj at kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > This is an equivalent conversion and will ease scheduled removal of
> > > > WQ_NON_REENTRANT.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj at kernel.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > 
> > Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> for merging through any
> > tree that pleases you (if it makes merging easier for WQ_NON_REENTRANT
> > removal). Or should I just merge this through drm-intel-next?
> 
> I think it would be better to route this one through drm-intel-next.
> WQ_NON_REENTRANT won't be deprecated until after the next -rc1 anyway.

Queued for -next, thanks for the patch.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel at ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48