[PATCH libdrm 02/24] radeon: remove empty function declarations

Jerome Glisse j.glisse at gmail.com
Wed Apr 1 14:26:26 PDT 2015


On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 09:57:40PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 1 April 2015 at 21:34, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 1 April 2015 at 18:30, Jerome Glisse <j.glisse at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 05:15:13PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> >>> Missing definition and unused since their introduction.
> >>>
> >>> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse at redhat.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com>
> >>
> >> NAK
> >>
> >> I use all this in tools to debug lockup. Best course of action is to
> >> exclude bof.h from being distributed. My tools static link and i just
> >> point them to libdrm git tree.
> >>
> > Did not notice any mention of such out-of-tree tools in the commit
> > that introduced these functions, so I've naively assumed that they are
> > unused.
> Scratch that - I'm blind.
> 
> Upon closer look at your radeondb repo, I cannot see any static
> linking in there. Also it seems that some of the functionality is
> duplicated between the two. With the radeondb version being out of
> date :'(

Yeah i guess i never pushed anywhere patches that did that, divergence btw
my memory and what is out there. All this symbol can just be hidden and
never exported. It would cleaner, but i still need the bof.h intact as i
tend to just cp it afaict into my local radeondb copy so that i am in
sync with libdrm code.

Cheers,
Jérôme

> 
> -Emil


More information about the dri-devel mailing list