[PATCH v3 2/5] drm/dsi: Try to match non-DT dsi devices

[Archit Taneja]

On 12/07/2015 02:15 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Dec 2015, Archit Taneja <architt at codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 11/30/2015 06:15 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
>>> Hi Archit,
>>>
>>> [auto build test ERROR on: v4.4-rc3]
>>> [also build test ERROR on: next-20151127]
>>>
>>> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Archit-Taneja/drm-dsi-DSI-for-devices-with-different-control-bus/20151130-200725
>>> config: x86_64-allyesdebian (attached as .config)
>>> reproduce:
>>>           # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>>>           make ARCH=x86_64
>>>
>>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>>
>>>      drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c: In function 'of_mipi_dsi_device_add':
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c:168:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'of_modalias_node' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>>        if (of_modalias_node(node, info.type, sizeof(info.type)) < 0) {
>>
>> Any suggestions on how to fix this? Is it ok to make DRM_MIPI_DSI
>> depend on CONFIG_OF?
>
> Please don't.

Just curious, how did x86 use DSI if the only way to create DSI devices
until now was via DT?

Archit

>
> BR,
> Jani.
>

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora 
Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation