[PATCH v3 2/5] drm/dsi: Try to match non-DT dsi devices
Jani Nikula
jani.nikula at linux.intel.com
Mon Dec 7 01:10:07 PST 2015
On Mon, 07 Dec 2015, Archit Taneja <architt at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On 12/07/2015 02:15 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Mon, 07 Dec 2015, Archit Taneja <architt at codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 11/30/2015 06:15 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
>>>> Hi Archit,
>>>>
>>>> [auto build test ERROR on: v4.4-rc3]
>>>> [also build test ERROR on: next-20151127]
>>>>
>>>> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Archit-Taneja/drm-dsi-DSI-for-devices-with-different-control-bus/20151130-200725
>>>> config: x86_64-allyesdebian (attached as .config)
>>>> reproduce:
>>>> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>>>> make ARCH=x86_64
>>>>
>>>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>>>
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c: In function 'of_mipi_dsi_device_add':
>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c:168:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'of_modalias_node' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>>> if (of_modalias_node(node, info.type, sizeof(info.type)) < 0) {
>>>
>>> Any suggestions on how to fix this? Is it ok to make DRM_MIPI_DSI
>>> depend on CONFIG_OF?
>>
>> Please don't.
>
> Just curious, how did x86 use DSI if the only way to create DSI devices
> until now was via DT?
Oh, you want the gory details... we use the DSI code as a library for
abstraction and helpers, without actually creating or registering the
devices.
BR,
Jani.
>
> Archit
>
>>
>> BR,
>> Jani.
>>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list