[Intel-gfx] [v3 0/7] Crystalcove (CRC) PMIC based panel and pwm control

[Shobhit Kumar]

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Ville Syrjälä
<ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 06:31:37PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 02:32:03PM +0530, Shobhit Kumar wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > Next update of the series reviewed at
>> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/22/155
>> >
>> > Major changes are few review comments from Varka and Ville being addressed. Also except
>> > for intel-gfx patches, all patches reviesion history is moved out of commit message.
>> >
>> > Hope this series finally finds its mark.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Shobhit
>> >
>> > Shobhit Kumar (7):
>> >   gpiolib: Add support for removing registered consumer lookup table
>> >   mfd: intel_soc_pmic_core: Add lookup table for Panel Control as GPIO
>> >     signal
>> >   mfd: intel_soc_pmic_crc: Add PWM cell device for Crystalcove PMIC
>> >   mfd: intel_soc_pmic_core: ADD PWM lookup table for CRC PMIC based PWM
>> >   pwm: crc: Add Crystalcove (CRC) PWM driver
>> >   drm/i915: Use the CRC gpio for panel enable/disable
>> >   drm/i915: Backlight control using CRC PMIC based PWM driver
>>
>> I think we have r-b/acks on all the patches now. Ok if I pull this in
>> through drm-intel.git for 4.3? Or should I make a topic branch with tag
>> and then send out pull requests to everyone? Or will each maintainer merge
>> on their own since it's all only coupled at runtime anyway? Any of these
>> would suit me.
>
> I forgot to mention that I had a build failure due to
> builtin_platform_driver() when I tried this (just changed it to
> module_platform_driver() to get past it). So I'm not sure if this
> now depends on some tree which isn't included in -nightly...

These patches are based on linux-next/master

Regards
Shobhit