[PATCH -v2 3/8] drm/exynos: remove struct *_win_data abstraction on planes

[Joonyoung Shim]

Hi,

On 03/26/2015 11:10 PM, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan at collabora.co.uk>
> 
> struct {fimd,mixer,vidi}_win_data was just keeping the same data
> as struct exynos_drm_plane thus get ride of it and use exynos_drm_plane
> directly.
> 
> It changes how planes are created and remove .win_mode_set() callback
> that was only filling all *_win_data structs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan at collabora.co.uk>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos7_drm_decon.c | 164 ++++++++--------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_crtc.c   |   9 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_crtc.h   |   1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c    |  14 --
>  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.h    |   5 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fimd.c   | 182 +++++++++----------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_plane.c  |  23 +---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_plane.h  |   6 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_vidi.c   | 123 ++++-------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c      | 212 ++++++++++-------------------
>  10 files changed, 242 insertions(+), 497 deletions(-)
> 

[snip]

> @@ -818,7 +762,9 @@ static int decon_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data)
>  {
>  	struct decon_context *ctx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>  	struct drm_device *drm_dev = data;
> -	int ret;
> +	struct exynos_drm_plane *exynos_plane;
> +	enum drm_plane_type type;
> +	int zpos, ret;
>  
>  	ret = decon_ctx_initialize(ctx, drm_dev);
>  	if (ret) {
> @@ -826,8 +772,16 @@ static int decon_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data)
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> -	ctx->crtc = exynos_drm_crtc_create(drm_dev, ctx->pipe,
> -					   EXYNOS_DISPLAY_TYPE_LCD,
> +	for (zpos = 0; zpos < WINDOWS_NR; zpos++) {
> +		type = (zpos == ctx->default_win) ? DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY :
> +						DRM_PLANE_TYPE_OVERLAY;
> +		exynos_plane_init(drm_dev, &ctx->planes[zpos], 1 << ctx->pipe,
> +				  type);

Doesn't error checking need about return value of exynos_plane_init?

Thanks.