[PATCH -v2 3/8] drm/exynos: remove struct *_win_data abstraction on planes

[Gustavo Padovan]

2015-03-31 Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim at samsung.com>:

> Hi,
> 
> On 03/26/2015 11:10 PM, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> > From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan at collabora.co.uk>
> > 
> > struct {fimd,mixer,vidi}_win_data was just keeping the same data
> > as struct exynos_drm_plane thus get ride of it and use exynos_drm_plane
> > directly.
> > 
> > It changes how planes are created and remove .win_mode_set() callback
> > that was only filling all *_win_data structs.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan at collabora.co.uk>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos7_drm_decon.c | 164 ++++++++--------------
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_crtc.c   |   9 +-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_crtc.h   |   1 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c    |  14 --
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.h    |   5 +-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fimd.c   | 182 +++++++++----------------
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_plane.c  |  23 +---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_plane.h  |   6 +-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_vidi.c   | 123 ++++-------------
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c      | 212 ++++++++++-------------------
> >  10 files changed, 242 insertions(+), 497 deletions(-)
> > 
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > @@ -818,7 +762,9 @@ static int decon_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data)
> >  {
> >  	struct decon_context *ctx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> >  	struct drm_device *drm_dev = data;
> > -	int ret;
> > +	struct exynos_drm_plane *exynos_plane;
> > +	enum drm_plane_type type;
> > +	int zpos, ret;
> >  
> >  	ret = decon_ctx_initialize(ctx, drm_dev);
> >  	if (ret) {
> > @@ -826,8 +772,16 @@ static int decon_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data)
> >  		return ret;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	ctx->crtc = exynos_drm_crtc_create(drm_dev, ctx->pipe,
> > -					   EXYNOS_DISPLAY_TYPE_LCD,
> > +	for (zpos = 0; zpos < WINDOWS_NR; zpos++) {
> > +		type = (zpos == ctx->default_win) ? DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY :
> > +						DRM_PLANE_TYPE_OVERLAY;
> > +		exynos_plane_init(drm_dev, &ctx->planes[zpos], 1 << ctx->pipe,
> > +				  type);
> 
> Doesn't error checking need about return value of exynos_plane_init?

Sure, I think it is needed too. I'll send a new patch set shortly.

	Gustavo