[PATCH v5 09/12] drm/exynos: remove exported functions from exynos_drm_plane

[Gustavo Padovan]

2015-05-21 Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi at math.uni-bielefeld.de>:

> Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> > 2015-05-21 Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan at collabora.co.uk>:
> > 
> >> 2015-05-21 Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi at math.uni-bielefeld.de>:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> like I said before, this clashes with my commit 'drm/exynos: plane: honor
> >>> buffer offset for dma_addr' (5d878bdb51bd7915ba3def8b531238c67624aa58),
> >>> which is currently sitting in airlied's drm-fixes.
> >>
> >> Inki has to merge his -fixes tree into exynos-drm-next to solve this.
> >> It is the only way I can rebase on top of your commit and solve the
> >> conflict.
> >> Anyway, I just figured that exynos-drm-next was updated from yesterday
> >> to today so this v5 doesn't apply on today's tree. I'll send a v6 once
> >> Inki merges "drm/exynos: plane: honor buffer offset for dma_addr" into
> >> exynos-drm-next.
> >>
> >> Inki, can you please do that? so we can proceed with atomic and
> >> hopefully have it ready for 4.2 merge window.
> > 
> > Actually the patch is on exynos-drm-next but with a different commit id.
> > I wonder why. Why did you applied it directly to your branch instead of
> > merging the -fixes tree? Now we have the same commit with the differents
> > hashes in the tree.
> I never do merges for my tree, I always rebase (either on stable/linux
> or torvalds/master). For submitting patches I cherry-pick stuff to the
> corresponding upstream branch (exynos-drm-next in this case) and then
> submit via git-send-email.

Actually I'm asking Inki. He pushed the same patch twice.

	Gustavo