[PATCH v5 09/12] drm/exynos: remove exported functions from exynos_drm_plane

[Tobias Jakobi]

Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> 2015-05-21 Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi at math.uni-bielefeld.de>:
> 
>> Gustavo Padovan wrote:
>>> 2015-05-21 Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan at collabora.co.uk>:
>>>
>>>> 2015-05-21 Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi at math.uni-bielefeld.de>:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> like I said before, this clashes with my commit 'drm/exynos: plane: honor
>>>>> buffer offset for dma_addr' (5d878bdb51bd7915ba3def8b531238c67624aa58),
>>>>> which is currently sitting in airlied's drm-fixes.
>>>>
>>>> Inki has to merge his -fixes tree into exynos-drm-next to solve this.
>>>> It is the only way I can rebase on top of your commit and solve the
>>>> conflict.
>>>> Anyway, I just figured that exynos-drm-next was updated from yesterday
>>>> to today so this v5 doesn't apply on today's tree. I'll send a v6 once
>>>> Inki merges "drm/exynos: plane: honor buffer offset for dma_addr" into
>>>> exynos-drm-next.
>>>>
>>>> Inki, can you please do that? so we can proceed with atomic and
>>>> hopefully have it ready for 4.2 merge window.
>>>
>>> Actually the patch is on exynos-drm-next but with a different commit id.
>>> I wonder why. Why did you applied it directly to your branch instead of
>>> merging the -fixes tree? Now we have the same commit with the differents
>>> hashes in the tree.
>> I never do merges for my tree, I always rebase (either on stable/linux
>> or torvalds/master). For submitting patches I cherry-pick stuff to the
>> corresponding upstream branch (exynos-drm-next in this case) and then
>> submit via git-send-email.
> 
> Actually I'm asking Inki. He pushed the same patch twice.
Ah, sorry, I'm getting confused here! :D


> 
> 	Gustavo
>