[PATCH 2/3] drm/bridge: adv7533: Initialize regulators

Archit Taneja architt at codeaurora.org
Wed Aug 31 16:54:30 UTC 2016


Hi Laurent,

On 8/31/2016 9:23 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Archit,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Wednesday 31 Aug 2016 16:22:09 Archit Taneja wrote:
>> ADV7533 requires supply to the AVDD, V1P2 and V3P3 pins for proper
>> functionality.
>>
>> Initialize and enable the regulators during probe itself. Controlling
>> these dynamically is left for later.
>
> You should document the power supplies in the DT bindings.

The DT bindings doc update was a part of the same series. I accidentally
Cc'd you only for this patch.

>
>> Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
>> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Archit Taneja <architt at codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511.h     | 16 ++++++++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511_drv.c | 34 +++++++++++++++------
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7533.c     | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   3 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511.h index 161c923..3fcb202 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511.h
>> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/hdmi.h>
>>   #include <linux/i2c.h>
>>   #include <linux/regmap.h>
>> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>>
>>   #include <drm/drm_crtc_helper.h>
>>   #include <drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h>
>> @@ -327,6 +328,10 @@ struct adv7511 {
>>
>>   	struct gpio_desc *gpio_pd;
>>
>> +	struct regulator *avdd;
>> +	struct regulator *v1p2;
>> +	struct regulator *v3p3;
>> +
>>   	/* ADV7533 DSI RX related params */
>>   	struct device_node *host_node;
>>   	struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi;
>> @@ -343,6 +348,8 @@ void adv7533_mode_set(struct adv7511 *adv, struct
>> drm_display_mode *mode); int adv7533_patch_registers(struct adv7511 *adv);
>>   void adv7533_uninit_cec(struct adv7511 *adv);
>>   int adv7533_init_cec(struct adv7511 *adv);
>> +int adv7533_init_regulators(struct adv7511 *adv);
>> +void adv7533_uninit_regulators(struct adv7511 *adv);
>>   int adv7533_attach_dsi(struct adv7511 *adv);
>>   void adv7533_detach_dsi(struct adv7511 *adv);
>>   int adv7533_parse_dt(struct device_node *np, struct adv7511 *adv);
>> @@ -374,6 +381,15 @@ static inline int adv7533_init_cec(struct adv7511 *adv)
>> return -ENODEV;
>>   }
>>
>> +static inline int adv7533_init_regulators(struct adv7511 *adv)
>> +{
>> +	return -ENODEV;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void adv7533_uninit_regulators(struct adv7511 *adv)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +
>>   static inline int adv7533_attach_dsi(struct adv7511 *adv)
>>   {
>>   	return -ENODEV;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511_drv.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511_drv.c index ec8fb2e..221bc75
>> 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511_drv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511_drv.c
>> @@ -941,6 +941,7 @@ static int adv7511_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c, const
>> struct i2c_device_id *id) if (!adv7511)
>>   		return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> +	adv7511->i2c_main = i2c;
>>   	adv7511->powered = false;
>>   	adv7511->status = connector_status_disconnected;
>>
>> @@ -958,13 +959,21 @@ static int adv7511_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c, const
>> struct i2c_device_id *id) if (ret)
>>   		return ret;
>>
>> +	if (adv7511->type == ADV7533) {
>> +		ret = adv7533_init_regulators(adv7511);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>>   	/*
>>   	 * The power down GPIO is optional. If present, toggle it from active
> to
>>   	 * inactive to wake up the encoder.
>>   	 */
>>   	adv7511->gpio_pd = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "pd", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
>> -	if (IS_ERR(adv7511->gpio_pd))
>> -		return PTR_ERR(adv7511->gpio_pd);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(adv7511->gpio_pd)) {
>> +		ret = PTR_ERR(adv7511->gpio_pd);
>> +		goto uninit_regulators;
>> +	}
>>
>>   	if (adv7511->gpio_pd) {
>>   		mdelay(5);
>> @@ -972,12 +981,14 @@ static int adv7511_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c, const
>> struct i2c_device_id *id) }
>>
>>   	adv7511->regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(i2c, &adv7511_regmap_config);
>> -	if (IS_ERR(adv7511->regmap))
>> -		return PTR_ERR(adv7511->regmap);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(adv7511->regmap)) {
>> +		ret = PTR_ERR(adv7511->regmap);
>> +		goto uninit_regulators;
>> +	}
>>
>>   	ret = regmap_read(adv7511->regmap, ADV7511_REG_CHIP_REVISION, &val);
>>   	if (ret)
>> -		return ret;
>> +		goto uninit_regulators;
>>   	dev_dbg(dev, "Rev. %d\n", val);
>>
>>   	if (adv7511->type == ADV7511)
>> @@ -987,7 +998,7 @@ static int adv7511_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c, const
>> struct i2c_device_id *id) else
>>   		ret = adv7533_patch_registers(adv7511);
>>   	if (ret)
>> -		return ret;
>> +		goto uninit_regulators;
>>
>>   	regmap_write(adv7511->regmap, ADV7511_REG_EDID_I2C_ADDR,
> edid_i2c_addr);
>>   	regmap_write(adv7511->regmap, ADV7511_REG_PACKET_I2C_ADDR,
>> @@ -995,10 +1006,11 @@ static int adv7511_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
>> const struct i2c_device_id *id) regmap_write(adv7511->regmap,
>> ADV7511_REG_CEC_I2C_ADDR, cec_i2c_addr); adv7511_packet_disable(adv7511,
>> 0xffff);
>>
>> -	adv7511->i2c_main = i2c;
>>   	adv7511->i2c_edid = i2c_new_dummy(i2c->adapter, edid_i2c_addr >> 1);
>> -	if (!adv7511->i2c_edid)
>> -		return -ENOMEM;
>> +	if (!adv7511->i2c_edid) {
>> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
>> +		goto uninit_regulators;
>> +	}
>>
>>   	if (adv7511->type == ADV7533) {
>>   		ret = adv7533_init_cec(adv7511);
>> @@ -1043,6 +1055,9 @@ err_unregister_cec:
>>   	adv7533_uninit_cec(adv7511);
>>   err_i2c_unregister_edid:
>>   	i2c_unregister_device(adv7511->i2c_edid);
>> +uninit_regulators:
>> +	if (adv7511->type == ADV7533)
>> +		adv7533_uninit_regulators(adv7511);
>>
>>   	return ret;
>>   }
>> @@ -1054,6 +1069,7 @@ static int adv7511_remove(struct i2c_client *i2c)
>>   	if (adv7511->type == ADV7533) {
>>   		adv7533_detach_dsi(adv7511);
>>   		adv7533_uninit_cec(adv7511);
>> +		adv7533_uninit_regulators(adv7511);
>>   	}
>>
>>   	drm_bridge_remove(&adv7511->bridge);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7533.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7533.c index 5eebd15..03a59fd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7533.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7533.c
>> @@ -178,6 +178,51 @@ err:
>>   	return ret;
>>   }
>>
>> +int adv7533_init_regulators(struct adv7511 *adv)
>> +{
>> +	struct device *dev = &adv->i2c_main->dev;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	adv->avdd = devm_regulator_get(dev, "avdd");
>> +	if (IS_ERR(adv->avdd))
>> +		return PTR_ERR(adv->avdd);
>
> Doesn't this cause backward compatibility issues with existing device trees
> that don't declare regulators ?

Well, there isn't any DT upstream that doesn't declare these regulators.
The first DT file using ADV7533 would be merged in 4.9, and same for
this patch.

Also, if a DT file doesn't declare a regulator here (maybe because the
board has a constant supply to this pin since it's powered up), a dummy
regulator would be used here.

>
>> +	adv->v1p2 = devm_regulator_get(dev, "v1p2");
>> +	if (IS_ERR(adv->v1p2))
>> +		return PTR_ERR(adv->v1p2);
>> +
>> +	adv->v3p3 = devm_regulator_get(dev, "v3p3");
>> +	if (IS_ERR(adv->v3p3))
>> +		return PTR_ERR(adv->v3p3);
>> +
>> +	ret = regulator_enable(adv->avdd);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>> +	ret = regulator_enable(adv->v1p2);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto err_v1p2;
>> +
>> +	ret = regulator_enable(adv->v3p3);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto err_v3p3;
>
> How about using the devm_regulator_bulk_*() API ?

Yes, that makes more sense, should make the error handling
simpler too.

Thanks for the review,
Archit

>
>> +	return 0;
>> +err_v3p3:
>> +	regulator_disable(adv->v1p2);
>> +err_v1p2:
>> +	regulator_disable(adv->avdd);
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void adv7533_uninit_regulators(struct adv7511 *adv)
>> +{
>> +	regulator_disable(adv->v3p3);
>> +	regulator_disable(adv->v1p2);
>> +	regulator_disable(adv->avdd);
>> +}
>> +
>>   int adv7533_attach_dsi(struct adv7511 *adv)
>>   {
>>   	struct device *dev = &adv->i2c_main->dev;
>

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project


More information about the dri-devel mailing list