[PATCH v2] drm/bridge: adv7511: Remove unused code blocks

[Sharma, Jitendra]

Thanks for comments.


On 10/20/2016 2:15 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>> IMO it would be better to use id->driver_data unconditionally and save a
>>> call to of_device_get_match_data()
>>> What would you suggest to move ahead?
>> I'd suggest using id->driver_data unconditionally, but I'd like Wolfram's
>> opinion on this (CC'ed).
> IIUC: I'd suggest to leave it as it is.
>
> There are people working on removing the quirky fallback to
> i2c_device_id in case of_compatible is not provided. If that gets
> mainline, you don't have i2c_device_id anymore with DT matching. So all
> binding methods should be self-contained.
ok
Should we leave as it is, redundant if-else code block also, or fix it 
as posted in patch v2
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20161020/16049e45/attachment.html>