[PATCH] staging: vboxvideo: adapt to new TTM interface
Christian König
ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com
Thu Nov 23 16:14:28 UTC 2017
I missed this driver because it is in the staging area.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
---
drivers/staging/vboxvideo/vbox_ttm.c | 17 ++++++-----------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/vboxvideo/vbox_ttm.c b/drivers/staging/vboxvideo/vbox_ttm.c
index 4eb410a2a1a8..231c89e0699c 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/vboxvideo/vbox_ttm.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/vboxvideo/vbox_ttm.c
@@ -183,13 +183,6 @@ static void vbox_ttm_io_mem_free(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev,
{
}
-static int vbox_bo_move(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
- bool evict, bool interruptible,
- bool no_wait_gpu, struct ttm_mem_reg *new_mem)
-{
- return ttm_bo_move_memcpy(bo, interruptible, no_wait_gpu, new_mem);
-}
-
static void vbox_ttm_backend_destroy(struct ttm_tt *tt)
{
ttm_tt_fini(tt);
@@ -237,7 +230,6 @@ static struct ttm_bo_driver vbox_bo_driver = {
.init_mem_type = vbox_bo_init_mem_type,
.eviction_valuable = ttm_bo_eviction_valuable,
.evict_flags = vbox_bo_evict_flags,
- .move = vbox_bo_move,
.verify_access = vbox_bo_verify_access,
.io_mem_reserve = &vbox_ttm_io_mem_reserve,
.io_mem_free = &vbox_ttm_io_mem_free,
@@ -374,6 +366,7 @@ static inline u64 vbox_bo_gpu_offset(struct vbox_bo *bo)
int vbox_bo_pin(struct vbox_bo *bo, u32 pl_flag, u64 *gpu_addr)
{
+ struct ttm_operation_ctx ctx = { false, false };
int i, ret;
if (bo->pin_count) {
@@ -389,7 +382,7 @@ int vbox_bo_pin(struct vbox_bo *bo, u32 pl_flag, u64 *gpu_addr)
for (i = 0; i < bo->placement.num_placement; i++)
bo->placements[i].flags |= TTM_PL_FLAG_NO_EVICT;
- ret = ttm_bo_validate(&bo->bo, &bo->placement, false, false);
+ ret = ttm_bo_validate(&bo->bo, &bo->placement, &ctx);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -403,6 +396,7 @@ int vbox_bo_pin(struct vbox_bo *bo, u32 pl_flag, u64 *gpu_addr)
int vbox_bo_unpin(struct vbox_bo *bo)
{
+ struct ttm_operation_ctx ctx = { false, false };
int i, ret;
if (!bo->pin_count) {
@@ -416,7 +410,7 @@ int vbox_bo_unpin(struct vbox_bo *bo)
for (i = 0; i < bo->placement.num_placement; i++)
bo->placements[i].flags &= ~TTM_PL_FLAG_NO_EVICT;
- ret = ttm_bo_validate(&bo->bo, &bo->placement, false, false);
+ ret = ttm_bo_validate(&bo->bo, &bo->placement, &ctx);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -430,6 +424,7 @@ int vbox_bo_unpin(struct vbox_bo *bo)
*/
int vbox_bo_push_sysram(struct vbox_bo *bo)
{
+ struct ttm_operation_ctx ctx = { false, false };
int i, ret;
if (!bo->pin_count) {
@@ -448,7 +443,7 @@ int vbox_bo_push_sysram(struct vbox_bo *bo)
for (i = 0; i < bo->placement.num_placement; i++)
bo->placements[i].flags |= TTM_PL_FLAG_NO_EVICT;
- ret = ttm_bo_validate(&bo->bo, &bo->placement, false, false);
+ ret = ttm_bo_validate(&bo->bo, &bo->placement, &ctx);
if (ret) {
DRM_ERROR("pushing to VRAM failed\n");
return ret;
--
2.11.0
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list