[PATCH] staging: vboxvideo: adapt to new TTM interface
Hans de Goede
hdegoede at redhat.com
Thu Nov 23 16:35:19 UTC 2017
Hi,
On 23-11-17 17:14, Christian König wrote:
> I missed this driver because it is in the staging area.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
Thank you, looks good to me.
Can you please re-send this with Greh KH (the staging maintainer)
added in the To: list and my:
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com>
Added?
Regards,
Hans
> ---
> drivers/staging/vboxvideo/vbox_ttm.c | 17 ++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vboxvideo/vbox_ttm.c b/drivers/staging/vboxvideo/vbox_ttm.c
> index 4eb410a2a1a8..231c89e0699c 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vboxvideo/vbox_ttm.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vboxvideo/vbox_ttm.c
> @@ -183,13 +183,6 @@ static void vbox_ttm_io_mem_free(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev,
> {
> }
>
> -static int vbox_bo_move(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> - bool evict, bool interruptible,
> - bool no_wait_gpu, struct ttm_mem_reg *new_mem)
> -{
> - return ttm_bo_move_memcpy(bo, interruptible, no_wait_gpu, new_mem);
> -}
> -
> static void vbox_ttm_backend_destroy(struct ttm_tt *tt)
> {
> ttm_tt_fini(tt);
> @@ -237,7 +230,6 @@ static struct ttm_bo_driver vbox_bo_driver = {
> .init_mem_type = vbox_bo_init_mem_type,
> .eviction_valuable = ttm_bo_eviction_valuable,
> .evict_flags = vbox_bo_evict_flags,
> - .move = vbox_bo_move,
> .verify_access = vbox_bo_verify_access,
> .io_mem_reserve = &vbox_ttm_io_mem_reserve,
> .io_mem_free = &vbox_ttm_io_mem_free,
> @@ -374,6 +366,7 @@ static inline u64 vbox_bo_gpu_offset(struct vbox_bo *bo)
>
> int vbox_bo_pin(struct vbox_bo *bo, u32 pl_flag, u64 *gpu_addr)
> {
> + struct ttm_operation_ctx ctx = { false, false };
> int i, ret;
>
> if (bo->pin_count) {
> @@ -389,7 +382,7 @@ int vbox_bo_pin(struct vbox_bo *bo, u32 pl_flag, u64 *gpu_addr)
> for (i = 0; i < bo->placement.num_placement; i++)
> bo->placements[i].flags |= TTM_PL_FLAG_NO_EVICT;
>
> - ret = ttm_bo_validate(&bo->bo, &bo->placement, false, false);
> + ret = ttm_bo_validate(&bo->bo, &bo->placement, &ctx);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -403,6 +396,7 @@ int vbox_bo_pin(struct vbox_bo *bo, u32 pl_flag, u64 *gpu_addr)
>
> int vbox_bo_unpin(struct vbox_bo *bo)
> {
> + struct ttm_operation_ctx ctx = { false, false };
> int i, ret;
>
> if (!bo->pin_count) {
> @@ -416,7 +410,7 @@ int vbox_bo_unpin(struct vbox_bo *bo)
> for (i = 0; i < bo->placement.num_placement; i++)
> bo->placements[i].flags &= ~TTM_PL_FLAG_NO_EVICT;
>
> - ret = ttm_bo_validate(&bo->bo, &bo->placement, false, false);
> + ret = ttm_bo_validate(&bo->bo, &bo->placement, &ctx);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -430,6 +424,7 @@ int vbox_bo_unpin(struct vbox_bo *bo)
> */
> int vbox_bo_push_sysram(struct vbox_bo *bo)
> {
> + struct ttm_operation_ctx ctx = { false, false };
> int i, ret;
>
> if (!bo->pin_count) {
> @@ -448,7 +443,7 @@ int vbox_bo_push_sysram(struct vbox_bo *bo)
> for (i = 0; i < bo->placement.num_placement; i++)
> bo->placements[i].flags |= TTM_PL_FLAG_NO_EVICT;
>
> - ret = ttm_bo_validate(&bo->bo, &bo->placement, false, false);
> + ret = ttm_bo_validate(&bo->bo, &bo->placement, &ctx);
> if (ret) {
> DRM_ERROR("pushing to VRAM failed\n");
> return ret;
>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list