[PATCH v3] drm: drm_vblank_cleanup: WARN when refcount > 0

[PrasannaKumar Muralidharan]

Hi Chris,

Sorry I missed adding you in to list while sending the vblank refcount
patch. Hope you saw that.

On 25-Oct-2017 9:55 PM, "PrasannaKumar Muralidharan" <
prasannatsmkumar at gmail.com> wrote:

Warn when refcount > 0 in drm_vblank_cleanup.

Signed-off-by: PrasannaKumar Muralidharan <prasannatsmkumar at gmail.com>
---
Changes in v3:
* Dropped i915 patch that is used for testing this.

No changes in v2.

 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
index 70f2b95..3e61aeb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
@@ -405,6 +405,8 @@ void drm_vblank_cleanup(struct drm_device *dev)
        for (pipe = 0; pipe < dev->num_crtcs; pipe++) {
                struct drm_vblank_crtc *vblank = &dev->vblank[pipe];

+               WARN_ON(atomic_read(&vblank->refcount) > 0);
+
                WARN_ON(READ_ONCE(vblank->enabled) &&
                        drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET));

--
2.10.0


As you anticipated Intel CI found that this patch triggers the non zero
vblank refcount warning on module unload.

Please advice on what to do next. Should I don't think I have to do
something for this patch. If that's not the case please let me know what to
do from my side for this patch.

Note: Replying from an Android device. Please forgive typos.

Thanks and regards,
PrasannaKumar
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20171026/dfdecb80/attachment.html>