[PATCH 2/2] drm/sched: Rework HW fence processing.
Grodzovsky, Andrey
Andrey.Grodzovsky at amd.com
Fri Dec 7 15:22:47 UTC 2018
On 12/07/2018 03:19 AM, Christian König wrote:
> Am 07.12.18 um 04:18 schrieb Zhou, David(ChunMing):
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: dri-devel <dri-devel-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of
>>> Andrey Grodzovsky
>>> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2018 1:41 AM
>>> To: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org; amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org;
>>> ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com; eric at anholt.net;
>>> etnaviv at lists.freedesktop.org
>>> Cc: Liu, Monk <Monk.Liu at amd.com>
>>> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] drm/sched: Rework HW fence processing.
>>>
>>> Expedite job deletion from ring mirror list to the HW fence signal
>>> callback
>>> instead from finish_work, together with waiting for all such fences
>>> to signal in
>>> drm_sched_stop we garantee that already signaled job will not be
>>> processed
>>> twice.
>>> Remove the sched finish fence callback and just submit finish_work
>>> directly
>>> from the HW fence callback.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Christian Koenig <Christian.Koenig at amd.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky at amd.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c | 4 +++-
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++----------
>>> -------
>>> include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h | 10 +++++++--
>>> 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c
>>> index d8d2dff..e62c239 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c
>>> @@ -151,7 +151,8 @@ struct drm_sched_fence
>>> *to_drm_sched_fence(struct dma_fence *f)
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(to_drm_sched_fence);
>>>
>>> struct drm_sched_fence *drm_sched_fence_create(struct
>>> drm_sched_entity *entity,
>>> - void *owner)
>>> + void *owner,
>>> + struct drm_sched_job *s_job)
>>> {
>>> struct drm_sched_fence *fence = NULL;
>>> unsigned seq;
>>> @@ -163,6 +164,7 @@ struct drm_sched_fence
>>> *drm_sched_fence_create(struct drm_sched_entity *entity,
>>> fence->owner = owner;
>>> fence->sched = entity->rq->sched;
>>> spin_lock_init(&fence->lock);
>>> + fence->s_job = s_job;
>>>
>>> seq = atomic_inc_return(&entity->fence_seq);
>>> dma_fence_init(&fence->scheduled,
>>> &drm_sched_fence_ops_scheduled, diff --git
>>> a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>>> index 8fb7f86..2860037 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>>> @@ -284,31 +284,17 @@ static void drm_sched_job_finish(struct
>>> work_struct *work)
>>> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&sched->work_tdr);
>>>
>>> spin_lock_irqsave(&sched->job_list_lock, flags);
>>> - /* remove job from ring_mirror_list */
>>> - list_del_init(&s_job->node);
>>> - /* queue TDR for next job */
>>> drm_sched_start_timeout(sched);
>>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sched->job_list_lock, flags);
>>>
>>> sched->ops->free_job(s_job);
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static void drm_sched_job_finish_cb(struct dma_fence *f,
>>> - struct dma_fence_cb *cb)
>>> -{
>>> - struct drm_sched_job *job = container_of(cb, struct drm_sched_job,
>>> - finish_cb);
>>> - schedule_work(&job->finish_work);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> static void drm_sched_job_begin(struct drm_sched_job *s_job) {
>>> struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched = s_job->sched;
>>> unsigned long flags;
>>>
>>> - dma_fence_add_callback(&s_job->s_fence->finished, &s_job-
>>>> finish_cb,
>>> - drm_sched_job_finish_cb);
>>> -
>>> spin_lock_irqsave(&sched->job_list_lock, flags);
>>> list_add_tail(&s_job->node, &sched->ring_mirror_list);
>>> drm_sched_start_timeout(sched);
>>> @@ -418,13 +404,17 @@ void drm_sched_start(struct drm_gpu_scheduler
>>> *sched, bool unpark_only) {
>>> struct drm_sched_job *s_job, *tmp;
>>> bool found_guilty = false;
>>> - unsigned long flags;
>>> int r;
>>>
>>> if (unpark_only)
>>> goto unpark;
>>>
>>> - spin_lock_irqsave(&sched->job_list_lock, flags);
>>> + /*
>>> + * Locking the list is not required here as the sched thread is
>>> parked
>>> + * so no new jobs are being pushed in to HW and in drm_sched_stop
>>> we
>>> + * flushed any in flight jobs who didn't signal yet. Also
>>> concurrent
>>> + * GPU recovers can't run in parallel.
>>> + */
>>> list_for_each_entry_safe(s_job, tmp, &sched->ring_mirror_list,
>>> node) {
>>> struct drm_sched_fence *s_fence = s_job->s_fence;
>>> struct dma_fence *fence;
>>> @@ -453,7 +443,6 @@ void drm_sched_start(struct drm_gpu_scheduler
>>> *sched, bool unpark_only)
>>> }
>>>
>>> drm_sched_start_timeout(sched);
>>> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sched->job_list_lock, flags);
>>>
>>> unpark:
>>> kthread_unpark(sched->thread);
>>> @@ -505,7 +494,7 @@ int drm_sched_job_init(struct drm_sched_job *job,
>>> job->sched = sched;
>>> job->entity = entity;
>>> job->s_priority = entity->rq - sched->sched_rq;
>>> - job->s_fence = drm_sched_fence_create(entity, owner);
>>> + job->s_fence = drm_sched_fence_create(entity, owner, job);
>>> if (!job->s_fence)
>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>> job->id = atomic64_inc_return(&sched->job_id_count);
>>> @@ -593,15 +582,25 @@ static void drm_sched_process_job(struct
>>> dma_fence *f, struct dma_fence_cb *cb)
>>> struct drm_sched_fence *s_fence =
>>> container_of(cb, struct drm_sched_fence, cb);
>>> struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched = s_fence->sched;
>>> + struct drm_sched_job *s_job = s_fence->s_job;
>>
>> Seems we are back to original, Christian argued s_fence and s_job are
>> with different lifetime , Do their lifetime become same now?
>
> No, that still doesn't work. The scheduler fence lives much longer
> than the job, so we would have a dangling pointer here.
>
> The real question is why we actually need that? I mean we just need to
> move the callback structure into the job, don't we?
>
> Christian.
So let's say I move the .cb from drm_sched_fence to drm_sched_job, and
there it's ok to reference
job->s_fence because s_fence life as at least as the job, right ?
Andrey
>
>>
>> -David
>>
>>> + unsigned long flags;
>>> +
>>> + cancel_delayed_work(&sched->work_tdr);
>>>
>>> - dma_fence_get(&s_fence->finished);
>>> atomic_dec(&sched->hw_rq_count);
>>> atomic_dec(&sched->num_jobs);
>>> +
>>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&sched->job_list_lock, flags);
>>> + /* remove job from ring_mirror_list */
>>> + list_del_init(&s_job->node);
>>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sched->job_list_lock, flags);
>>> +
>>> drm_sched_fence_finished(s_fence);
>>>
>>> trace_drm_sched_process_job(s_fence);
>>> - dma_fence_put(&s_fence->finished);
>>> wake_up_interruptible(&sched->wake_up_worker);
>>> +
>>> + schedule_work(&s_job->finish_work);
>>> }
>>>
>>> /**
>>> diff --git a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
>>> index c94b592..23855c6 100644
>>> --- a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
>>> +++ b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
>>> @@ -115,6 +115,8 @@ struct drm_sched_rq {
>>> struct drm_sched_entity *current_entity;
>>> };
>>>
>>> +struct drm_sched_job;
>>> +
>>> /**
>>> * struct drm_sched_fence - fences corresponding to the scheduling
>>> of a job.
>>> */
>>> @@ -160,6 +162,9 @@ struct drm_sched_fence {
>>> * @owner: job owner for debugging
>>> */
>>> void *owner;
>>> +
>>> + /* Back pointer to owning job */
>>> + struct drm_sched_job *s_job;
>>> };
>>>
>>> struct drm_sched_fence *to_drm_sched_fence(struct dma_fence *f); @@
>>> -330,8 +335,9 @@ void drm_sched_entity_set_priority(struct
>>> drm_sched_entity *entity,
>>> enum drm_sched_priority priority); bool
>>> drm_sched_entity_is_ready(struct drm_sched_entity *entity);
>>>
>>> -struct drm_sched_fence *drm_sched_fence_create(
>>> - struct drm_sched_entity *s_entity, void *owner);
>>> +struct drm_sched_fence *drm_sched_fence_create(struct
>>> drm_sched_entity *s_entity,
>>> + void *owner,
>>> + struct drm_sched_job *s_job);
>>> void drm_sched_fence_scheduled(struct drm_sched_fence *fence); void
>>> drm_sched_fence_finished(struct drm_sched_fence *fence);
>>>
>>> --
>>> 2.7.4
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dri-devel mailing list
>>> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list