[PATCH 2/2] drm/sched: Rework HW fence processing.
Koenig, Christian
Christian.Koenig at amd.com
Fri Dec 7 15:26:27 UTC 2018
Am 07.12.18 um 16:22 schrieb Grodzovsky, Andrey:
>
> On 12/07/2018 03:19 AM, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 07.12.18 um 04:18 schrieb Zhou, David(ChunMing):
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: dri-devel <dri-devel-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of
>>>> Andrey Grodzovsky
>>>> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2018 1:41 AM
>>>> To: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org; amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org;
>>>> ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com; eric at anholt.net;
>>>> etnaviv at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>> Cc: Liu, Monk <Monk.Liu at amd.com>
>>>> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] drm/sched: Rework HW fence processing.
>>>>
>>>> Expedite job deletion from ring mirror list to the HW fence signal
>>>> callback
>>>> instead from finish_work, together with waiting for all such fences
>>>> to signal in
>>>> drm_sched_stop we garantee that already signaled job will not be
>>>> processed
>>>> twice.
>>>> Remove the sched finish fence callback and just submit finish_work
>>>> directly
>>>> from the HW fence callback.
>>>>
>>>> Suggested-by: Christian Koenig <Christian.Koenig at amd.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky at amd.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c | 4 +++-
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++----------
>>>> -------
>>>> include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h | 10 +++++++--
>>>> 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c
>>>> index d8d2dff..e62c239 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_fence.c
>>>> @@ -151,7 +151,8 @@ struct drm_sched_fence
>>>> *to_drm_sched_fence(struct dma_fence *f)
>>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(to_drm_sched_fence);
>>>>
>>>> struct drm_sched_fence *drm_sched_fence_create(struct
>>>> drm_sched_entity *entity,
>>>> - void *owner)
>>>> + void *owner,
>>>> + struct drm_sched_job *s_job)
>>>> {
>>>> struct drm_sched_fence *fence = NULL;
>>>> unsigned seq;
>>>> @@ -163,6 +164,7 @@ struct drm_sched_fence
>>>> *drm_sched_fence_create(struct drm_sched_entity *entity,
>>>> fence->owner = owner;
>>>> fence->sched = entity->rq->sched;
>>>> spin_lock_init(&fence->lock);
>>>> + fence->s_job = s_job;
>>>>
>>>> seq = atomic_inc_return(&entity->fence_seq);
>>>> dma_fence_init(&fence->scheduled,
>>>> &drm_sched_fence_ops_scheduled, diff --git
>>>> a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>>>> index 8fb7f86..2860037 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>>>> @@ -284,31 +284,17 @@ static void drm_sched_job_finish(struct
>>>> work_struct *work)
>>>> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&sched->work_tdr);
>>>>
>>>> spin_lock_irqsave(&sched->job_list_lock, flags);
>>>> - /* remove job from ring_mirror_list */
>>>> - list_del_init(&s_job->node);
>>>> - /* queue TDR for next job */
>>>> drm_sched_start_timeout(sched);
>>>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sched->job_list_lock, flags);
>>>>
>>>> sched->ops->free_job(s_job);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> -static void drm_sched_job_finish_cb(struct dma_fence *f,
>>>> - struct dma_fence_cb *cb)
>>>> -{
>>>> - struct drm_sched_job *job = container_of(cb, struct drm_sched_job,
>>>> - finish_cb);
>>>> - schedule_work(&job->finish_work);
>>>> -}
>>>> -
>>>> static void drm_sched_job_begin(struct drm_sched_job *s_job) {
>>>> struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched = s_job->sched;
>>>> unsigned long flags;
>>>>
>>>> - dma_fence_add_callback(&s_job->s_fence->finished, &s_job-
>>>>> finish_cb,
>>>> - drm_sched_job_finish_cb);
>>>> -
>>>> spin_lock_irqsave(&sched->job_list_lock, flags);
>>>> list_add_tail(&s_job->node, &sched->ring_mirror_list);
>>>> drm_sched_start_timeout(sched);
>>>> @@ -418,13 +404,17 @@ void drm_sched_start(struct drm_gpu_scheduler
>>>> *sched, bool unpark_only) {
>>>> struct drm_sched_job *s_job, *tmp;
>>>> bool found_guilty = false;
>>>> - unsigned long flags;
>>>> int r;
>>>>
>>>> if (unpark_only)
>>>> goto unpark;
>>>>
>>>> - spin_lock_irqsave(&sched->job_list_lock, flags);
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Locking the list is not required here as the sched thread is
>>>> parked
>>>> + * so no new jobs are being pushed in to HW and in drm_sched_stop
>>>> we
>>>> + * flushed any in flight jobs who didn't signal yet. Also
>>>> concurrent
>>>> + * GPU recovers can't run in parallel.
>>>> + */
>>>> list_for_each_entry_safe(s_job, tmp, &sched->ring_mirror_list,
>>>> node) {
>>>> struct drm_sched_fence *s_fence = s_job->s_fence;
>>>> struct dma_fence *fence;
>>>> @@ -453,7 +443,6 @@ void drm_sched_start(struct drm_gpu_scheduler
>>>> *sched, bool unpark_only)
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> drm_sched_start_timeout(sched);
>>>> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sched->job_list_lock, flags);
>>>>
>>>> unpark:
>>>> kthread_unpark(sched->thread);
>>>> @@ -505,7 +494,7 @@ int drm_sched_job_init(struct drm_sched_job *job,
>>>> job->sched = sched;
>>>> job->entity = entity;
>>>> job->s_priority = entity->rq - sched->sched_rq;
>>>> - job->s_fence = drm_sched_fence_create(entity, owner);
>>>> + job->s_fence = drm_sched_fence_create(entity, owner, job);
>>>> if (!job->s_fence)
>>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>>> job->id = atomic64_inc_return(&sched->job_id_count);
>>>> @@ -593,15 +582,25 @@ static void drm_sched_process_job(struct
>>>> dma_fence *f, struct dma_fence_cb *cb)
>>>> struct drm_sched_fence *s_fence =
>>>> container_of(cb, struct drm_sched_fence, cb);
>>>> struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched = s_fence->sched;
>>>> + struct drm_sched_job *s_job = s_fence->s_job;
>>> Seems we are back to original, Christian argued s_fence and s_job are
>>> with different lifetime , Do their lifetime become same now?
>> No, that still doesn't work. The scheduler fence lives much longer
>> than the job, so we would have a dangling pointer here.
>>
>> The real question is why we actually need that? I mean we just need to
>> move the callback structure into the job, don't we?
>>
>> Christian.
> So let's say I move the .cb from drm_sched_fence to drm_sched_job, and
> there it's ok to reference
> job->s_fence because s_fence life as at least as the job, right ?
Exactly. Well, we could actually make the live of s_fence a bit shorter
and drop it as soon as it is signaled.
Christian.
>
> Andrey
>
>>> -David
>>>
>>>> + unsigned long flags;
>>>> +
>>>> + cancel_delayed_work(&sched->work_tdr);
>>>>
>>>> - dma_fence_get(&s_fence->finished);
>>>> atomic_dec(&sched->hw_rq_count);
>>>> atomic_dec(&sched->num_jobs);
>>>> +
>>>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&sched->job_list_lock, flags);
>>>> + /* remove job from ring_mirror_list */
>>>> + list_del_init(&s_job->node);
>>>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sched->job_list_lock, flags);
>>>> +
>>>> drm_sched_fence_finished(s_fence);
>>>>
>>>> trace_drm_sched_process_job(s_fence);
>>>> - dma_fence_put(&s_fence->finished);
>>>> wake_up_interruptible(&sched->wake_up_worker);
>>>> +
>>>> + schedule_work(&s_job->finish_work);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> /**
>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
>>>> index c94b592..23855c6 100644
>>>> --- a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
>>>> +++ b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
>>>> @@ -115,6 +115,8 @@ struct drm_sched_rq {
>>>> struct drm_sched_entity *current_entity;
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> +struct drm_sched_job;
>>>> +
>>>> /**
>>>> * struct drm_sched_fence - fences corresponding to the scheduling
>>>> of a job.
>>>> */
>>>> @@ -160,6 +162,9 @@ struct drm_sched_fence {
>>>> * @owner: job owner for debugging
>>>> */
>>>> void *owner;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Back pointer to owning job */
>>>> + struct drm_sched_job *s_job;
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> struct drm_sched_fence *to_drm_sched_fence(struct dma_fence *f); @@
>>>> -330,8 +335,9 @@ void drm_sched_entity_set_priority(struct
>>>> drm_sched_entity *entity,
>>>> enum drm_sched_priority priority); bool
>>>> drm_sched_entity_is_ready(struct drm_sched_entity *entity);
>>>>
>>>> -struct drm_sched_fence *drm_sched_fence_create(
>>>> - struct drm_sched_entity *s_entity, void *owner);
>>>> +struct drm_sched_fence *drm_sched_fence_create(struct
>>>> drm_sched_entity *s_entity,
>>>> + void *owner,
>>>> + struct drm_sched_job *s_job);
>>>> void drm_sched_fence_scheduled(struct drm_sched_fence *fence); void
>>>> drm_sched_fence_finished(struct drm_sched_fence *fence);
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 2.7.4
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> dri-devel mailing list
>>>> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list